Find a Lawyer

ZAREEN SHAH versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 392 and 449 of the Clause were blind and no one was seen to prosecute to prove his case, primarily depending on the circumstances in which the recovery of the shotgun, the blood of the accused. Stained lace, golden ornaments, positive reports included. Regarding the statement of the forensic science laboratory and the accused, the magistrate had clearly stated in response to a question before recording his confessional statement that he had been tortured and beaten up by the police. It cannot be stated, therefore, that the accused's voluntary confession statement was not voluntary, did not in fact take place and did not fit into the circumstances surrounding him as alleged by the prosecution. The recovery of a shotgun also looks suspicious and could not yield any result when the prosecutor's The confessional statement of the liquor hearing was erased despite its positive report that the forensic science laboratory, when manipulated by PO's, was a very common occurrence, and despite proving the use of shotguns in crime, It is not proven that the accused used the golden jewelry recovery will do little to improve the prosecution's case as there was no allegation of jewelry. The victim's home was stolen. Secondly, no evidence was brought on the record to indicate that they belonged to the deceased and thirdly because the identity parade was not held to establish their origin or ownership when the blood was shed. The recovery of the stained lace did not prove anything against the accused how to become a advocate from Rajana lawyer