Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALI versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 392/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a), the reduction of FIRs in the definition of evidence was promptly filed and both the accused were specifically charged Was named as the perpetrator of the alleged crime. The fugitive co-accused Ocular's case was correctly provided by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, and both said witnesses had identified the accused in front of the trial court and pointed their fingers at them. Have also shared about their role. No background of dissatisfaction and bitterness has been disclosed between eyewitnesses and the accused so that eyewitnesses can be falsely implicated in this case. Both said eyewitnesses had offered a condemnatory explanation for his presence with the deceased at that time. The crime scene from the scene was similar to the recovered fire. I took possession of a suspect Medical evidence provided full support to the prosecution case. The prosecution's witnesses made permanent statements before the trial court and their statements were trusted. It was born that witnesses' statements contained some minor contradictions from where the shot was made. During the prosecution at night, the firing on the deceased was plausible as the suspects successfully managed to establish their case beyond reasonable doubt, the trial court justified in recording the accused's conviction. The one who deserved the death sentence was already the second accused, sentenced to death by the trial court, was a young man who had a immigration advocates from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer