The accused accused and accomplices have been reported in this case, complimenting the testimony of sections 324/337 F (iii) / 337 F (v) Khattal, Ghat Jaffa, Najaf Zafaqqila, while armed with firearms. As attacked. The complaining party was specifically accused of repeatedly firing on the testimony of an injured lawyer prosecutor behind the incident; the father of the accused was murdered by the complainant 15/16 years before the present incident. The accused, under Sections 324, 337F (iii) and 337F (v), were notified to the police after a delay of 56 hours without any reasonable explanation, medical examination of the injured on the day of the accident. has been. Police were also available at the hospital and at the time, but neither the complainant nor any witness testified at the time, including the injured, which has had an impact on the injured. It has been alleged by the accused and the co-accused. The witness of the injured prosecutor, who allegedly suffered injuries at the hands of the accused, openly admitted in his interim examination that he made a statement to the investigating officer for the first time after 10/12 days. The complainant and the witnesses, who were not injured, had time to report the matter to the police as soon as possible but did not do so even though one of the injured persons was acquitted against the accused. The statement could not be accepted as good news. In view of the fact of the incident, the motive did not appeal the argument because the person belonging to the complaining party, who was allegedly killed by the accused's father, was acquitted and in addition to the incident. After two decades
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
