Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF SIDDIQUI versus HAJI SHARIF KHAN THROUGH L.RS.

The capital of the updated Office of Power of Attorney on Fraud and Misrepresentation with Section 12 (2) of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Articles 188 and 214 of the General Power of Attorney showed that the principal purpose of the principal was to improve the property. Is to rent flats on the property mentioned above. And to take all incidental and other necessary steps for the sale of the flat and the appointment of an attorney, the Attorney General's power was not allowed to the Attorney General anywhere in the case if the situation required that the entire property be compromised in the pending case. Do it. In which the applicant had filed a joint written statement with two other defendants, in the absence of any specific conditions, the general attorney could not have considered that the authority to compromise and to make a confessional statement in favor of the defendant. Is, when it was in his own interest. A partner and respondent company managing attorney of his own interest required that he should seek special permission from the Principal to present such a compromise act in court, in the absence of any special provision in the General Power of Attorney There were misrepresentations in the presence and there were elements of fraud that did not authorize a settlement in this case. The agent / lawyer could not engage with a lawyer / lawyer for any purpose for which he was not authorized. The agent could not delegate any authority which was not entrusted to him by the principal where conflicting decisions were made. The misrepresentation of evidence was reflected and the non-enforcement of the law and the verdict and the decree was obtained through false pretenses, the naughty clause of section 12 (2) gave it famous high court advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer