Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND OTHERS versus ZAHID SHARIF

Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) allegations of termination of employment after the government employee was acquitted of a criminal case, a regular investigation was initiated and summary action was taken on the direction of the competent authority. Subsequently, an appeal was imposed on the Executive Engineer as a competent authority by the Executive Engineer and the Government employees were restored with the benefits of withdrawing from the job at the beginning of the disciplinary proceedings. , Was complied with the procedure and the appropriate time for a public servant to be heard. Upon receipt of the dismissal order, the dismissal order was approved by the executive engineer under false impression or because of it. Based on the inadvertent error and sub-rule on the basis of which the proceedings cannot be declared non-preliminary and in view of the summary procedure on the division of the inquiry and the direction of the competent authority, no new inquiry can be conducted. Because it would cause serious prejudice to the public servant. One of the beneficial places to fill in the blanks, if any, should be given to a public servant. The Supreme Court accepted the appeal and, while seeking remand for an investigative case, postponed the disapproval decision without making a fresh inquiry to decide the matter based on the available evidence. immigration advocates from Darya Khan lawyer