TASLEEM JAN AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN
The disqualification of the applicant for development on the grounds of disqualification of the Constitution Petition in the Articles 199 and 212 of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (Constitution of 1974), Section 4, will not be prohibited, where the service tribunal The jurisdiction will be restricted to this place only. It should be determined that having the office of a public servant in which the office is held is quite different from the ability to hold office, where the fitness of a senior officer is comparable in light of the fitness performance justification. There was talk. As a result of a subordinate decision of a competent authority based on the principles of purpose, it will only be concerned with its individual qualifications and performance on the job; the qualification will be purely related to the terms and conditions of eligibility. Or it could be challenged otherwise. In the constitutional petition, the service tribunal had previously stated that the qualification view, which is never related to the fitness of an officer to be held in a higher position, only that the service tribunal had jurisdiction over the matter and not The High Court, the Supreme Court, accepted the appeal and set aside the unwanted decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Ratto Dero lawyer