Find a Lawyer

JAWAID ARSHAD MIRZA THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES versus TRUSTEES OF HAJI SIR ABDULLAH HAROON

Section 15 (2) (vi), (3) (4) Termination of tenants on the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Protection) Act (XII of 1994), Sections 6, 10 and 19 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution It was requested that the only ground for demolition and reconstruction of the property, which was demolished and rebuilt by the competent authority before the landlord (Wakat) filed the eviction applications under the Sindh Cultural Heritage Act, 1994 Had obtained permission from. Section 15 (2) (vi) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance was required; the 1979 tenants also fully enjoyed the protection of section 15 (3) (4), the Sindh Rented Primes Ordinance 1979 of the 1979 rent controller. Jurisdiction will not be restricted. The premises were declared a protected heritage under section 19, Sindh Cultural Heritage (Protection) Act, 1994 when demolition of a building / reconstruction was possible only when there was a dispute between the owner / lane. Under the Delwar and Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act 1994, the relevant authority was resolved under the aforesaid Act and in accordance with the law and in the given situation the order of eviction was to be passed in favor of the landlord against which it was executed. Subject to condition. The tenants were created on a balanced and equitable curriculum only after approval of any objection / permission for demolition / reconstruction by the Committee under the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Protection) Act, 1994, after which the lower parties , Which did not demand any intervention from the High Court. Exercising its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the principles of the Constitution attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rajanpur lawyer