Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ KHAN versus STATE

Sections 497 (5) and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 365/34/109 Pre-arrest Guarantees, Report of Abduction of Principles Reporting the Abduction Missing was filed in the Police Station Nobody was suspected of any of them. Five days after the applicant filed the FIR for the alleged abduction of his son and the names of the suspects were mentioned, a few days after the report the alleged kidnapper returned to the country with two statements The alleged kidnappers made statements under Section 160 under Section 161, CRPC and another. Recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, the statements of the two were different from each other, the Judicial Magistrate recorded the alleged abductor's statement in English language under Section 164, CCPC, even though it was shown that he was in Urdu Also speaks and such action could not be approved by the Hindu Magistrate, as the circumstances of the case showed that the alleged kidnapper had left his house on his own principles under bail cancellation charges. The material available in the record shows that the unclean order of bail to the accused cannot be considered illegal, perverse or with no jurisdiction, otherwise, if his case was justified, there would be no pre-arrest warrant for the accused. No problem. And no useful purpose can be presented to extend the bail after the arrest if the accused's bail is canceled on any technical basis, if he can be guaranteed on his merits after his arrest. No, the case was not submitted for advance cancellation by the trial court top advocates from Khanewal lawyer