AMANULLAH versus STATE
In the appeal against the trial court of the section 417 (2A) Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149, the accused was acquitted at the hearing of the suspect while admitting the bad order. It was reported that the suspect was present at that time. The fact is that he was armed with a carbine, but the injuries attributed to him were not confirmed by medical evidence, but in fact he was described as an external wound and Medco's legal report or post-mortem report did not affect its recovery during the investigation. Do not identify the wound that entered the left hips of the trial court; in the circumstances, the suspect had the benefit of the doubt and was rightly acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Vehari lawyer
