Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE

Ocular testimony from the medical evidence attributed to his own role in this case was designated in the FIR of the appreciation of the provisions of Sections 302 (b), 324, 337A and 337D. The father of the man was a natural eyewitness who had thoroughly imposed the three accused in the crime and his evidence encouraged confidence in the testimony of the eyewitness who, despite any hostility or unlawful desire, in this case. The accused could not be allowed to falsely implicate the parties who died because of their close relations, and the accused's FIR After being nominated with their specific characters, no question about their identity can be raised, especially when the torch that was the source of the light was taken into police custody, and the incident was not challenged, Nevertheless, it has been proved that there is no shortage of punishment for the accused under Section 302. b), the PPC record was available on offense and the conviction of the accused was maintained under the circumstances pakistani advocates Jehangira lawyer