HASEEB ULLAH versus STATE
Prior to the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/148/149, the grant of the name of the co-accused was not specifically mentioned in the FIR and had no role in the incident, During the police investigation, the man was injured. He recorded his statement in which he challenged the names of the criminals mentioned in the FIR and also played a special role for the accused, as well as the testimony of the prosecutor who was injured in the first Medico. The number had grown to four and they were declared. The flare up in nature, but as a result of the medical examination carried out by the board, all the injured were lacerated, which again charged the prosecutor's version roll with the knife of the injured prosecutor's witness. Collided and it became a matter of further investigation. In the circumstances, the suspect was already guaranteed interim bail, it was confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer