Find a Lawyer

QAZI ABDUL SHAKOOR versus HIGH COURT OF SINDH AND ANOTHER

Inquiries against RR4 (1) (b) (iv) and 8 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Appellant, who served as the Reader of the Civil Judge. He was dismissed without employment. He was convicted by summary military court and sentenced to 9 months' RI. Appellant was sentenced by the Military Military Court for filing a complaint against him on charges of fraud and misrepresentation. His sentence and sentence was approved by the summary military court, the high court declared it illegal and the appellate department's appeal without any jurisdiction was filed against his dismissal order. Was dismissed, the appellant appealed to the service tribunal, as the order of his dismissal was based on the summary military sentence of his sentence and his termination. The dismissal order should be set aside because the military orders the dismissal of the appellant on the basis of conviction by the court. Has been laid on the very basis, with no jurisdiction and no legal effect, according to which the super-structure will fall completely. As a result of the appellant's failure, the field will not be held. The order cannot be upheld that the order was set aside for the appellant, even though his term has already expired, he will only be entitled to financial benefits from the date of approval of the improper order. immigration advocates email from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer