MUHAMMAD AHMAD versus STATE
FIR Approval of Further Investigative Story Described Under Procurement Was not beyond doubt. The incident was registered after an unusual delay of three days, the PPC did not focus on the matter, the injury to the back of the injured witness's chest did not extend to the body cavity and no one was hurt. Had not arrived If the body of the injured body does not extend to that part of the body, then it cannot be treated as a jifa. The crime with which the accused was charged did not come into it, Section 497. No prohibition clause, no CCP investigating officer searches There was no help in the hearing because there was no blood stain during the recovery process. The freelance witness was involved in a prosecution case against the accused, came under the scope of the inquiry, was entitled to be released on bail, under the circumstances, he was declared confessed on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer
