Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

39, 40 and 70 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition preparing a fresh unanimous statement, excluding the first statement of count to the Returning Officer, upon receiving the result from all polling stations, including the controversial polling station. Has it been stated in Form No. XV under R40 of Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000, stating that the applicants received maximum votes and the applicants were declared as retired candidates? What was said that they were issued a permanent statement and exchanged with the District Returning Officer According to the rules, the respondents / unsuccessful candidates filed by them have alleged that the counting statement has been tampered with by the Presiding Officer of the controversial polling station, before the Returning Officer counted the polling count. Created a fresh unanimous statement excluding the statement. In the station in which the votes of the applicants were reversed, the Returning Officer declared the respondents / failed candidates as top candidates instead of the applicants who said that the amended statement of the counting was confirmed by the Punjab Local Government Election. Rolls 2000, or Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001 are not allowed. After the election results have been published in the Gazette, the Ground Returning Officer or the Presiding Officer will become the Returning Officer, Facts Office, and his only remedy available is to change his definitive statement about the Punjab Local Government Election Rules. Election petition was to be submitted under RR70 of 2000. All contests under R40 (2) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 family advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer