MESSRS SAHIB JEE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Offices 59 (1) and 62 The Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), Sections 2 (3) and 10 (8) Cell Assessment Returns were set aside for separate audit complaints against such assessments. Under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, it was claimed that the Assessing Officer had no legal obligation to wait for the decision of the Federal Tax Ombudsman nor did the Federal Tax Ombudsman. The order has also issued a merit to the accused against merit. The practice of discretion in the principles of administrative discrimination by the relevant tax employee was to be justified The general demand of the administrative administration was that the Assessing Officer should wait for the decision of the Federal Tax Ombudsman unless the assessment was banned. Go in. Any reasonable cause created an additional administrative and legal obligation to carry out its recommendations in practice. The Federal Tax Ombudsman's Department requested the review of section 10 (8) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Office. ) Was rejected, though no action was barred by the Revenue Division during its approval. As decided in favor of reviewing the application for review, it will receive the benefit / relief allowed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman Department. its r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
