GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH versus DR. ZAHIDA KAKAR
Article 2 (185 ()), the interim injunction, set aside the exemption in competitive examinations, and the respondents were appointed on a contract basis for a period of six months to two years. At the end of the extension period, the respondents 'services were discontinued, it was reported that the defendants could apply to the Public Service Commission for their selection. The respondents' complaint was that the government had acquired the contract in the first place. Given the experience, the respondents promised to give 5% to 10% extra numbers. Respondents pleaded for a constitutional jurisdiction in which the High Court approved the ad interim order and the authorities were instructed to submit the democratic order. Maintain. If a candidate is given a discount of 5 to 10 percent in a competitive competitive exam, his / her score may increase in mathematics development, but his / her merit quota rating will always be increased by geometric PR. Comparing the rest of the candidates to a category of candidates would be akin to defaulting to a default, which, by all means of justice, was a manifestation of discrimination when the Public Service Commission, when promoting certain posts, wished. Some experience of nature, the experience of any candidate was taken into consideration without discrimination, if open During the contest, any experience was demanded by the Public Service Commission, so being of the general nature and applicable to every candidate, was neither objectionable nor discriminatory as approved by the High Court. As a result of the decree, the usual tasks of the government also suffered and the same
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer