Find a Lawyer

MEHRBAN KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Article 62 CBR 1975 Circular No. 10, Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXVX 2000 of 2000) 1975, the petition for section 2 (3) was dismissed in writing, Order Sheet registration was finalized in the absence of Complainant / Diagnostic and Diagnostic absence at the end of rejected. Words of accuracy were rejected The order was written at the end of the entry in the order sheet and it appears that it is in a different ink, it seems that the words do not fit it. There was no valid reason for rejecting the initial wording of a valid valid dismissal request and the denial was an indirect measure for which the notice issued under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, did not indicate any assessment. had gone. The officer's intention to implement the Dandikar formula with a GP rate of 5 and was evaluated without appropriate opportunity was diagnosed as corrupt, so it cannot be considered. Simple assessment as amended The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommends that in the case of the complainant, the assessment of the income tax for the assessment year 2002, 2003 2003 should be revoked under section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and after giving its permission A new diagnosis should be made. Reasonable opportunity for the complainant to be heard; that the new diagnosis should be made by an officer other than the officer who made the original diagnosis. In the context of mismanagement, a warning letter should be issued to the Income Tax Officer and placed on his / her personal file. In the context of the Income Tax Officer's case with the complainant as a customer, the relevant authorities may also examine. \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocates from Wahi hassain lawyer