Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAFEES ALIAS SOHAIL versus STATE

In a request for review under Sections 35 561/9439, by order A1, 9439 and ??A High Court Order reminding him of the order, CCP with Section 6161A, CRPC. Read, it cannot be modified because there was no provision in the Criminal Code of Conduct 1898. But to review such an order, but at the same time, under Section 6161A, CRPC, the High Court had inherited the powers that be, if there was an ambiguity or a point at which it was passed. Should have been fully considered, she would have changed or amended her order. The request for review was ruled out, so it was not considered that the Sessions Court, rejecting the petition filed under Section 22A, CCPC High Court on the applicants was neither valid nor valid. It was only authorized to impose penalties / costs, therefore, it exercised its inherent powers under Section 6161 AA, Cr. The PC retained his order and withdrew it and changed it to the extent that it was not permissible to impose fines by the Sessions Court and that part of his order was set aside which led to the dismissal of the petition. Was gone Accordingly law firms from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer