Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus STATE

The definition of evidence against Section 9 (a) (iv), 10, 15 and 32 of the accused was that it was allotted a plot from the Chief Minister's discretionary quota by making a false declaration, after which the accused sold the lot. The Price Prosecution did not cite any evidence to indicate that before the issuance of the allotment order by the Chief Minister or when the alleged affidavit / declaration was signed and tendered by the accused. In any housing scheme there was a plot for the accused or his dependents to indicate. The trial court found the accused guilty only because he sold the plot to another person, arguing that the reasoning of the accused was not merely plausible because he later plotted the plot. Sold to, its statement is not an affidavit. The allegations were linked to a plot allotment that he would not sell the same to a third person; the prosecutor, without any doubt, failed to prove the case against the accused, as he was acquitted of the charge. Gone \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Depal Pur lawyer