MUHAMMAD ALI versus MUZAMIL HUSSAIN
Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/430/148/149 guarantees, the termination of the accused was equipped with deadly weapons that they used effectively and they were treated with special character Medico legal certificate. Was attributed, the first aspect being contradictory. The witnesses' statements under Account Section 161, CCP, had, in view of the tremendous material available against the accused, guaranteed them a preliminary arrest by the trial court, and their specific role was inadmissible. Extraordinary pre-arrest bailiffs could not be given to the suspects, especially after obtaining arrest warrant before the absence of any special utility against the police and the accused were trying to subdue the prosecution witnesses and Filing a cross complaint can be ineffective. Given the pressure, the nature of the allegations and the strange facts and circumstances of the case, especially when someone's legs were removed as a result of the prosecution's testimony, the trial was set to allow pre-arrest bail. Failed to enforce good apply principles, especially when the trial court granted bail granted by the trial court was returned, circumstances r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer