Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAQ versus STATE

A joint study of Sections 196, 173 and 4 (h) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 295 of some Crimes 5 196, CR PC and Section 295A shows that under Section 295A, the PPC There was no crime. Against an individual, it was actually against the state, therefore, under this procedure it was necessary that the court take serious offense in the offense under Section 295, PPC only if the complaint was directed by the Central Government or the concerned provincial government. From, or under the authority of, or the personal interests of some officers empowered by either of the two governments to remain in collective interest or to file a complaint under section 4 (h), f. There was a distinction of state interest between the CR, the CRPC meant that the allegation was orally or in writing. The magistrate committed the offense under the CRPC in view of the fact that a person, even if the known QR was unknown, committed a crime, but did not include the police officer's case report section 295. A., PPC could not proceed on the basis of the final report submitted under section I73, CCP, section I73, police officer / investigation officer under CCPC, section 196, CRP. Adhere to the provisions of section 5 under c. 196, CR: PCs were illegal which were not binding under section 53737, CR PC, non-compliance with section 666, CR PC will rescind the resulting action in the eyes of the law. If a method needs to be performed in a particular way, it needs to be. It was done in that manner, for the correct principles law firms from Kasur lawyer