Find a Lawyer

IRFAN KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Formation of Section 96 and (50 (bb) Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance), the issuance of a Certificate by the Department of the Bank of the deduction of tax on section 2 (source) tax return On this basis, no refund was issued and confirmed the deductions and it was not known whether the tax was also credited to the government account and no tax filing challan was presented and the deposits were not verified. Where possible, the complainant / complainant submitted a certificate from the bank regarding the deductions. And the assumption was in the complainant that the tax deduction from the rent paid by the bank to the complainant / reviewer, unless it was established in favor of the SC, was also filed by the complainant / SCCC. The monthly check received by the source can be verified by determining whether or not the amount received was paid according to the rental agreement, after the full rent or deduction of rent, if the tax was deducted from the rent. There is no reason to believe that the bank does not submit it to the public account and in any case the Complainant / Aadhaar It will be the responsibility of the Federal Tax Ombudsman to waive the small refund amount on the pretext of verification unless it can be substantiated that the bank certificate presented by the complainant is genuine. Was not \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer