Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER AND PROJECT DIRECTOR, GHAZI BAROTHA HY versus ADMINISTRATOR, DISTRICT COUNCIL SWABI AND 5 OTHERS

Arts 165 and 165 Tax exemption The federal government implemented a project through WAPDA and WAPDA assigned the contractor on time, and the contractor provided the crushing plant for the manufacture of various materials used in the construction work. And a concrete mixing unit was installed. The contractor, for this purpose, imposes taxes on the production and transportation of goods, stone, gravel, etc., exported from the jurisdiction of the District Councils \ S \ and \ H \ District Council. After Wapda's objection was rejected, he directed the contractor to pay the export tax, which led the contractors to pay Wapda under the notice, resulting in a written agreement between Wapda and the contractor. Such payment was to be made. After paying such taxes for a long time, the two were barred from taking advantage of a territorial dispute between the District Councils W WAPDA against the assertion of such taxation under Articles 165 and 165A of the Constitution. The application was filed, which was dismissed by the WAPDA before the Supreme Court, due to the federal government putting a plan into practice. Under Art 165 and 165A of the Constitution, the government, its properties and income etc. were exempted from tax; the appellant could not avail of Article 1765 or 165A of the constitution contractor, in any way. Could not be equated with imagination or reasoning. Neither did he claim it with the federal government, which proved that he had long sought such taxes. advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer