Find a Lawyer

INAM-UL-HAQ versus CHAIRMAN, F.P.S.C., ISLAMABAD

Rr 4 (ii) (b) and 6 (iii) (d) Subject to relaxation in age The change of the domicile candidate of the State of Jammu and Kashmir has led to an attempt to soften the upper age limit to the extent that it is a state of Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir is subject to the Federal Public. The service commission declined softly because the candidate had earlier declared himself a domicile of Balochistan but after that he claimed to be subject to the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The jurisdiction of the legitimate candidate's commission was retained. Who was subject to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, to be eligible for approval of the privileges granted by R 4 (ii) (b) of the Competitive Examination Rules 1977, there was no need to be a permanent resident of this State or Independent. Kashmir Territory or Northern Territory such a candidate was required to show that he is subject to the State of Jammu and Kashmir. After being satisfied with such condition, the candidate became entitled to relaxation irrespective of the age limit. Regardless of whether he was a resident of Azad Kashmir or the Public Service Commission in the Northern Territory or any other part of Pakistan, the impression is that the candidate was subject to Jammu, claiming relaxation in upper age limit and Kashmir state. Kashmir was shifting its ancestral area from the province of Balochistan to Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the Federal Public Service Commission and The wrong decisions of the High Court were set aside and the petition for leave was changed, the Supreme Court declared that the candidate's case was not a change of domicile and that he was competitive as a candidate in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. By R4 (ii) (b) of the Examination Rules, 1977, b power of attorney advocate Liaquat Pur lawyer