Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZEEM versus SECRETARY (IRRIGATION AND POWER) GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE AND ANOTHER

Recruitment in R12 Punjab Civil Services, Rules (relaxation of upper age limit), 1976, R3 (v) Notification No. SOR III 1 72, Constitution of Pakistan 14 1973, 1962 (1973), Arts 25 and 199 Constitution. Equal Opportunities for Application The Principle of Discrimination of Applicants Applicants 'grievances Applicants' grievances in the two departments of the same provincial government had different upper age limits for the positions of Assistant Executive Engineer / Sub Divisional Officer in the Irrigation and Power Development Department. While the limit was 25 years, the upper age limit for the Communications and Construction Department officials was five years with five years normal discount. Yat had submitted that he had been treated differently in the matter of public employment and that Article 25 of the Constitution guaranteed was violated. Equal opportunity in public employment was a part of Article 25 of the Constitution and, therefore, as an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Department of Communications and Construction, candidates for direct appointments were treated unfairly, both Equal responsibility was imposed in the jobs and no proper rating was presented to justify a different treatment for candidates for the position of Assistant Executive Engineer in the job description. The Irrigation and Power Punjab Public Service Commission, while rejecting the nomination of the applicants, did not take notice of R3 (v) of Punjab Civil Services Recruitment (upper age limit relaxation) Rules 1976, in which notification number SOR III. Was entered by 1 72 , Dated 14 6 1982 If public notice did not specify the incentives for candidates in public service, then immigration advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer