CH. NOOR AHMAD THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus ABDUL MAJID THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
O XLI, R 27 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suit for specific performance of the contract, excluding the production of the suit by trial, the plaintiff with the request under O XLI, R 27 Filing an appeal to the appellate court, the CPC Court dismissed the plaintiff's request for additional evidence without using his mind to prepare additional evidence and dismissed the appeal as well. The appellate court was bound to decide the petition filed for the preparation of additional evidence after the plea of mind, which was a condition that the appellate court. The decision of the arbitral application and the decision of the decision was based on the same order, the disapproval order, the judgment and the decree were decided with the result that the appeal and the application would be considered as a pending decision before the appellate court. Will be done after that. After the appellate court requests the mind within a specified period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
