Find a Lawyer

MST. HAJRAN BEGUM versus KH. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AND LEGAL HEIRS

Section 117 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, 4r (c) (V) and 67 of a Civil Code Regulation (V 1908), Section 115 and AXXVI, R9 Recovery of Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 Essential Actions of the Land Identified by the Plaintiffs Claiming that Defendants 'Respondents' Demand for Reinstatement of Land Acquisition of Land Sole, which relied on the report of a demarcation made by Revenue Officers under which the plaintiffs owned The defendants had violated some part of the plaintiff's land. And the order passed by the trial court was upheld by the appellate court, with the defendants demanding that the limitation proceedings not be carried out under the rules. Whenever the land officer was requested to make a land demarcation under section 117 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, the same matter was to be dealt with under the R67A of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules 1968, the Revenue Officer was given a Form 33 P. was obliged to issue notices. After the completion of the transcript of any person whose presence was deemed necessary or applicable to the Revenue Officer at the time of the demarcation of the boundary, the records should be in the register kept for this purpose in the office, the record is on evidence. That the report was a local commissioner's assumption and was unable to be relied upon because they believed that the plaintiffs' property was surrounded on three sides by the regal and permanent building on the road, thus, according to them, any encroachment on all three sides. No question was born. That the defendants must cross over to the property subject to the fourth. Under the law, such a conceivable way of detecting certain property was not legitimate, so that the report of the local commissioner advocate from Raiwind lawyer