Find a Lawyer

SYED KAMAL HUSSAIN SHAH versus ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE PESHAWAR HIGH COURT PESHAWAR

Section ((b) (i) of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunal Act (I of 1974), Section 4 (b) (i)), the applicant's ability to appeal, questioned the decision of the management committee of the High Court, He was deposed and some other judicial officers were promoted as Additional District and Sessions Judges (BPS 19) and added to the provisions of the North West Frontier Province Judicial Service Tribunal Act, 1991, Terminate the provisions of the West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act, 1974. The general provisions of Section 5 (b) (i) of the North West Frontier Province Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunals Act, 1991 It was the language of the Act, which clearly made it clear that no appeal would lie to the service tribunal against the authority's decision to determine the fitness of a person. The person appointed or appointed to a particular position or Promoted to the highest position, while the petitioner's prayer was for promotion to a higher position. The palette was considered by the management committee, but was not found suitable for promotion; it was merely the applicant's fitness. That was, and is not, that the competent appeals were not before the service tribunal, seeking promotion in view of their subject matter. ? law firms from Kunri lawyer