ABDUL SATTAR versus STATE
Definition of Section 2302 Evidence Although the prosecution witnesses were very close to each other and the accused was also closely related to them, they said that they would not find the witnesses as interested because they had been falsely prosecuted in this case. There was no previous enmity or animosity to be involved, nor was there any opportunity for it. According to eyewitnesses, the three suspects were residents of the same area instead of the original accused and they were able to prove their presence at the scene and location of the incident and immediately notified the police. went. Hours after the incident, there was no time left to consult and falsely implicate the accused, and it was not certain whether the FIR was accused of equipping a rifle. And at the trial he was told that he was armed with a pistol because he was the only one. Add example en The rifle and the pistol could not be denied for the sole reason that, otherwise, the material could not be denied from the suspect who fired on the victim's complaint as an illiterate. The points and credible witnesses were found to be permanent when they were found to be independent witnesses; their statements contained minor contradictions, as they would not be sufficient to exclude their evidence. At that time, no evidence was brought to the record to indicate that the medical evidence was inconsistent with the healing account on the material points regarding the place and the manner in which the alleged incident took place. And was seen in the killing. With any person
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Chunian lawyer