Find a Lawyer

STATE versus SHERIN KHAN

Section 185F Central Law Officers Ordinance (VII of 1970), Appeals Against Eligibility for Section 4 Neither the Law Officers Ordinance, Neither the Special Officer of the Law Officer Signed the Memo of Appeal in the 1970s nor Any Permit of Advocate Rights I was on the record. Syed Advocate on behalf of the federal government had the authority to assist only the Deputy Attorney General in his memorandum of appeal, which did not authorize him to file an appeal on behalf of the federal government officials of the Customs Department and he Appeal was not eligible to be filed. It will not be held that in the absence of any authority by the Revenue Division Counsel on behalf of the Federal Government, the Appeal Board did not have the authority to file an appeal by an officer under it. Assistant Collector, Customs Central Board of Revenue Advocate Appeal Failure to Appeal Appeal against Assistant Director, Intelligence and Investigation, Customs, Not Applicable, Special Judge, Appeals Against Customs , Was not authorized under Section 417, Deputy Director was unable to file a PC Advocate engaged by Customs (Appraisal), Appeal Advocate appointed by the Deputy Collector, Customs (Legal Division) was also unable to file appeal, Except for the federal government, any agency or official may be appealed under section 185F of the Customs Act 1969 Was not an option, through which only can be filed. Law officers and attorneys authorized to disqualify all appeals for various reasons mentioned above. criminal advocate from Baroute lawyer