Find a Lawyer

RAQUIA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD AZEEM

Section 6 and 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 suit orders the submission of a 1/5 of the trial after the trial of the property after the trial of the property, After receiving a written statement from the respondent / seller, 1 submission order was approved. On the plaintiff's failure to comply with the order of the trial court, the case was dismissed, the plaintiff's review petition filed with the High Court was also dismissed, claiming the plaintiff's validity was on behalf of the defendant / seller. Before filing written statements from, the order was submitted by the trial court for the submission of 5/5 of the fair value of the suit land, while it was stated that only after receiving the written statement of the shopkeeper and not receiving the written statement of the shopkeeper. The order was granted because the claimant's claim had no merit because under the provisions of Article 21 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Rai The order to submit 1 / 5th of the clear value of suit land of Offshore Purchase Act, 1993 could be made at any time before or at the time of settlement there was no compulsion regarding the intelligence of the matters which was stated That the order be made only after the written statement of the shopkeepers / defendants who were not even the required parties and they were also removed from the proceedings The plaintiff neither filed an extension of time for submission of 1 / Was Neither 5th nor Price had made any request in this regard. The High Court had passed a legal order after discussing the matter in detail. No, the Supreme Court did not find any reason to disagree with it. Was. immigration advocates phone number from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer