Find a Lawyer

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH versus HABIBUR REHMAN ABRO

R12 Police Rules 1934, R16 28 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The police officer was charged with corruption. The charge sheet against him was investigated and he was found innocent and the senior superintendent police acquitted him of the deputy inspector general police, while the senior superintendent of police agreed to the Sindh Police's R-12. Issued notice under (Talent and Discipline) The Deputy Inspector General found the officer guilty of the charges and was approved for two years, after telling the officer of the Rules 1988 why he should not be sentenced for his dismissal. Sentenced to confiscate a suspended service. After rejecting the departmental appeal, the officer challenged the unclean order before the service tribunal, which was canceled by the authority tribunal on leave request for appeal, to compare R 16 28 of the Police Rules 1934. Later in the Sindh Police R12 (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1988, a clear text has been filed stating that in view of the material change in the latest rules, the Deputy Inspector General has decided on a decided case. Was unable to solicit records and be punished in a case in which he was not given appellate or revisional authority under the latest rules and charged The option to alter the search for an amnesty was not given. Thus, the search of the Deputy Inspector General of Police for police, finding a culprit \ not guilty or finding a pardon cannot prove to be a turnover \ was not emphasized in support of any further matter. The request, with no merit, excluded the entity \ r \ n best advocate from Daharki lawyer