Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ARBAB AKBAR ADIL versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI


Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 10 (4), (5) and (6) Authentication order preventing the constitutional application do not provide copy of article Article as required under Section 3 (6) Was done The ordinance recommendation for the issuance of a detention order of the provincial police officer was received on 13 October 2005 at the Secretary's Home Office, while the grounds for detention in the detention order were made public. And for indefinite periods that were not in accordance with the requirements of the law, and on the basis of the above grounds, the detente could not possibly make any representation to the competent authority against the detention order and the Minister of the Interior did not apply his mind to the facts of the matter. What was done and worked mechanically, probably on the direction of some administrative authority whose name was not available on record, the detention order was a violation of security measures and the requirements provided in the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960. And are bound by the fundamental rights of the citizens enshrined in the Constitution of Pakistan Those who hear cases against Detino in which they can be sentenced by a trial court and not even sentenced. Even if the grounds for issuing a detention order against him were found to be groundless, if not one of the grounds of fact and the numerous grounds in the law, the entire detention order would be inappropriate to allege that Danto was a dangerous, effective and notorious person. By no means did Datino have a senior practicing lawyer at the age of 70, and the land was sufficient to end the entire detention order and the detention order was invalid.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Kasur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.