Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED versus MUHAMMAD MITHAL

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109 Guarantees, Grants of Bail were granted on the basis that the sole charge against Atal-Um's crime was conspiracy but not on that occasion. Was present and did not play an active role anywhere because the bail was tried to cancel the version presented in the FIR and it was also told by witnesses that he had no information at the time of the incident. Death had taken place. The enmity of the accused and his accomplice, which arises from the issue of money, will react in both ways and since the accused was not present on the spot, he himself commits a single document conspiracy offense in the FIR. It was not enough to do so or the kidnapper, who was not present on the occasion, would stand lower than when he encouraged his partner to commit the crime, he himself was present when the parties disputed Such a conspiracy could have been very easily established. There was a high likelihood of the alleged rival being found false on the other side, since in this case the accused's request was not capable of canceling the approved bail. power of attorney advocate Haveli Kahuta lawyer