HAJI MUHAMMAD SAIFULLAH KHAN versus AHMED MEHMOOD, ZILA NAZIM, DISTRICT GOVERNMENT RAHIM YAR KHAN
In the election petition to disqualify District Nazim on constituency 7979, 82, 79, & 95 and ZZ and to disqualify them on certain charges, the petitioners have represented the District Nazim with the Public Representation Section 92 of the Act. , & & Under 82 & 92, His office had demanded litigation and disqualification. , 1976 alleges that he misused his public position under section 79 of the Public Representation Act 1976 to affect the outcome of election proceedings, which is a matter of bribery, either through police or a party complaint. The session at can be served in the service of the judge. No legal action can be taken against Pakistan under the order of the Election Commission or Commissioner Petitioner or without complaint, in order to obtain such permission it is necessary to ensure that Zila Nazim was a person in the service of Pakistan. It was addressed that Zila Nazim falls into this category, while District Nazim submitted a certificate on record from the concerned Accounts Officer State. NG that he was not receiving any salary to perform the duties of the District Nazim Election Commission of Pakistan; he could not take any special action to prove himself guilty, nor could he apply the provisions of section 79 of the Act. Applicants can write prayers made by the applicant in the election application. The issue of Representation People Act, 1976 & 82 was made unpleasant, in which the petitioners alleged that in a newspaper, District Nazim was shown sitting at the meeting with the District Police Officer and District Coordination Officer. Will not In order to prove that the Zila Nazim was elected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
