Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus MRS. ISMAT FAIZ KHAN

Section 8 and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Appeal for the determination of fair rent was leased to the dependent tenant at a monthly rate of Rs. 650 The petitioner, 1979, sought the determination of fair rent and prayed that the rent be fixed at a monthly rate of Rs 10,000, the rent controller increased the rent from Rs 650 to Rs 2,500 which The landlord cannot keep up with the fact that the rent was Rs 10,000 for the same location at the adjoining location and the rent for the same building at the same flat 550 Upy the monthly rent controller to 2500 has been increased from Rs 650 to rent the premises under which it was unable to bring his case before lyndlydy. Within any component of the Section 8 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979, the appellate authority, in its decision to present record concrete evidence in relation to the increase in rent, despite admitting that there was no benefit to the landlord. The retention of the rent controller was maintained without giving any reason, the matter was conducive to the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction and the decisions made by the rent controller and the appellate authority were not to be retained. Both the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority have been postponed due to violations of the law and prescribed rules for the administration of justice. best advocate from Sangla Hill lawyer