NAFEES-UL-HASSAN versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY, KARACHI
O XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 dispute leasing on public land by interfering with the plaintiff's physical and constructive possession of the land area to obtain interim injunction against defendants, their agents, staff and / or members etc. With further claims to be dealt with, it is claimed that the plaintiff should be prevented from demolishing the construction on the property plaintiff, and with his request the Mukhtarkar / City Survey Officer submitted two survey reports and the second one was the Deputy Registrar ( Judicial) support this case and two survey reports of the Commissioners, as well as claimant documents regarding the parties and At the same time, the parties' relevant submissions led the court to the provisional view that the plaintiff had filed a case for injunction and that the question of dealing with irreparable harm and injury, along with the balance easement, was also upheld by the plaintiff's High Court. In favor, however, the refusal of both commissioners to provide assistance as a prayer in response to the news that the boundary wall erected by the plaintiff had been demolished and only the debris and other wild bushes on the disputed land. Has been found to have indicated that the suit land on any of the parties at the hearing at the hearing was the original High Court Mani was not in possession, in order to be protected from alienation of land that was imposed to suit the conditions imposed on the parties on both sides.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Adda Shaiwala lawyer