Find a Lawyer

JUNAID BARI versus STATE

The delay of 1 1/2 years in the filing of the FIR, Section 454/380 pre-arrest warrant, Section 454/380 pre-arrest bail, was significant and made the prosecution's version doubtful. The stagnation was that the suspect had revealed the hello. Defending the documents on the basis of falsifying the complainant's story and denying it on the grounds that it could not be claimed, no wrong can be ascertained in the case. According to the present accused and his accomplice, the complainant, while this case was too much, he did not conceal his identity with his maid before entering his office and apparently, at this time, 45C, PPC In the case which was found to be guaranteed, the accused did not enter the complainant's office with confession and intended to steal. This there was no theft. Therefore, the obligation of the accused under section 380, PPC, has yet to be determined, a further investigation on this question is needed. Considered under Section 497 (2), the CCP accused had joined the police investigation and was not wanted for the purpose, in which case the accused was granted a pre-arrest arrest warrant. \ r \ n online advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer