Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus NADIR ALI

O VIII, R 10 & O IX, R 7 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Trial for cancellation of declaration, declaration and permanent injunction of Articles 39, 42 and 54 Effective Phase I Trial Defendants Directed to file the Aliens. Written statements, but they failed to register a single case, were closed. Under O IX, R 7, the petition was moved by the defendants, the CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution, but their request was restored and the matter was heard and the defendant's direction was also opened. Submit written statements about payment of expenses along with the direction that written statements should be filed within a period of 15 days. Defendants who once again failed to file written statements within an extended time were again moved to appeal, but the defendants and their attorneys were postponed. Absent and the trial court ruled under Rule 10, R, 10, CPC, which was upheld in the appeal, the issue involved the proprietary rights of the plaintiff, which was not only denied by the defendants, but by the defendants. The rights record was also changed at the request of the defendant and there was also the risk of separating the claimants from the suit property by the defendants, only written statements were required for the decision of the case and the trial court entered the written statements. Provided the opportunity, but the defendants did not take advantage of the opportunity provided below. Exercised their powers and in the absence of any unlawful interference or irregularities in illegal decisions and decrees top advocates from Shogram lawyer