Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF SULEHRIA versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Sections 5 (1) (d) (f), 5 (2) (xxiii) and 13 (6) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Legislative Assembly, disqualify a candidate from the Supreme Court. In the Appeal Returning Officer, dismissing the objections of the respondent regarding the disqualification of the Appellant for contesting the election, he accepted the nomination of the appellant's papers and declared him eligible to contest the Returning Officer, against the order of the Chief Election Commissioner. When filing an appeal through accountability, any chance of defining your disobedience should, in an arbitrary manner, be contested by the Returning Officer's Appellant. The order disqualifying the applicant was canceled, and the nomination papers of the appellant were rejected and ordered to be removed from the list of nominees, Appeal of the Chief Election Commissioner to the suspended court before the High Court. Through the writ petition, but the High Court dismissed the writ petition despite the respondents, the appellant filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High Court approved in the writ petition. The appellant did not file a written statement in response to the applicant's writ petition proceedings. The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly (Election) Ordinance, 1970 was applied in the case of appellant if the candidate could be disqualified under Section 5 (2) (f) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly (Election) Ordinance 1970. If he were found guilty. Under any other law, corruption or illegal action is in force until the expiry of seven years from the date of execution of this order, but the High Court has improperly named the appellant under the said clause. inheritance advocates near Kamokey lawyer