Find a Lawyer

TARA CHAND AND OTHERS versus KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD, KARACHI

Arts 185, 188 and 25 of the Supreme Court Rules 1980, A. XXXIII, R 5 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XLI, R 33 The revision petition was in the applicant's civil service appointments that he discharged his appeal. No notice of acceptance of. The Supreme Court did not comply with the Supreme Court order. That he was one of the applicants who disregarded the panchayat and dismissal court orders before the High Court, who were appointed by the Supreme Court for appeal. The moment he found out about the Supreme Court decision, he approached the court and filed a civil review petition from time to time and, although he is a non-appealing party in appeals, Yet he was entitled to the same relief on the basis of the principle of equality, because the services of all such persons were sent by one order, thus, there was no difference between their case and the appellants and when it was When a trial tribunal or court makes a decision, it is the same on all fours. A point of the law regarding the terms of service of a public servant, which covers not only legal public servants, but also other civil servants who may have taken no legal action, justice and governance. The ruling demands that the benefit of the decision be extended to other public servants, who cannot be parties to the trial, rather than to the tribunal or another legal forum. That constitution was also clear on the point that before the law all citizens were equal and they were entitled to equal protection of the law. online advocate from Chicha watni lawyer