Find a Lawyer

SHER JAN versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 4 324 Valuation of evidence Both witnesses were present at the scene of the incident and one of them suffered serious injuries, under which he was taken to a hospital where he remained under treatment for a long time. The incident occurred on a broad day, and the injured were very close to being fired, and the medical certificate confirmed the fact that the phenomina of the alternatives was minimal and, in view of the facts and circumstances, the two The witnesses alleged that the accused had a non-contentious role in the shootings and fled the accused, while the injuries sustained by the injured were on the run. Attributed to Lism. The shooting occurred on a typical day in the vicinity of a tour that could not have been a case of mistaken identification that the witnesses had been examined for a long time, but nothing conducive to the motion could be removed. ? Both their prosecution witnesses strengthened each other on material points and the testimony was according to the medical evidence, independently upon the re-examination of the evidence, there was no weakness in the trial court's decision which The testimony of the witnesses was admissible under the assertion, admitting that the accused had no motive to stay away from the victim, had no substance as there could be a crime. Committed without cause and the real motive was always in the mind of the individual to commit the crime. The accused was absconding for a long time and no explanation could have been on the record for the abduction of the law, during which time the fugitive could be considered as a controversial piece of evidence in the circumstances, the accused in the commission of the crime of alibi best law firms from Gari Mori lawyer