Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN

Section 2 302 / evidence Evidence Re-examination of evidence and presence of doctor's views, witnesses, trial court in connection with numbers dismissed by the collateral account and medical evidence, sentenced the accused to death but the High Court in the jurisdiction of the appeal. The sentence was dismissed and the conviction was based on the fact that the testimony of the witnesses was not supported by the medical evidence and the witnesses were demonstrating insecurity against the accused. The reasons given by the High Court for denying the presence of witnesses on the occasion were so speculative, strange and artificial as to result in injuries. The result of a shot at the deceased person, which probably did not have a firearm and the medical evidence did not match the account of the eyewitnesses, was not based on the reasons. Was injured. The result of a single shot could have been just one opinion, which may or may not be true. Such an opinion was not such as failed to dispel direct evidence and did not suggest the absence of eyewitnesses on the spot. Kriska. Dispute of medical evidence with the ocular account in relation to the number and nature of the injuries may be relevant to ascertaining the role of an accused in the incident. There is no reasonable basis for denying eyewitnesses and excluding their evidence from consideration that two injuries or the same shot will result in injuries, if not then it is advisable to have eye drops. The witnesses did not see the incident or they suppressed the truth on the basis of the unidentified character of the natural witnesses. power of attorney advocate Sherani lawyer