Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

Section 497 (5) Revocation Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337 A (ii) / 337 F (i) / 337 L (ii) / 337 H (ii) / 440/148/149 guarantees, revocation of guaranteed bail. There was an attempt by the complainant to cancel on the basis that the accused had attacked the complainant's side and injured four persons while the accused had a fresh version against the complainant's party. And no such adversary was shown by the complainant. Which is enough to investigate the accused's case further in his crime because when a cross-version will be produced from the other side, the question is who was the attacker and who was the victim, the trial will require determination, Such a situation certainly should have been. No guarantee was offered for the guarantee of the accused, any of the offenses with which the accused was charged, Section 497 (1), the CRPC grant came under the prohibited clause of guarantee. There was a rule in the cases and the exception was denied and the bail was to be stopped. There will be advance penalty money which was not the e-policy policy reasons under which the trial court weighed in, which could have guaranteed the recognition of the law, a case for cancellation. Did not come \ r \ n property advocates from Thul lawyer