Find a Lawyer

SHEHZADO versus STATE

Section 302 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (4) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Constitution of Section 164 (1973), Article 185 (3) Judicial Confession Recording withdrawn. The judicial confession of the affidavit was relied primarily upon by the magistrate on the confessional statement of the trial court under Section 302 PPC for the death sentence, but it did not constitute a crime against the property ( Under the ordinance, in 1979, in 1979, section 392 was changed to PPC for ten years. It was taken by the accused that the confessional statement was recorded on oath and that he was not admissible in the evidence and that with the exclusion of the judicial confession, there was no further evidence, directly or circumstantially, of the accused's own Connecting it to the legal justification of the crime disclosed in the confessional statement was done in the FIR as if the confessional statement of the defendant in connection with the FIR story constituted the truth of the complainant's statement and the defendant's confession. The statement was also proposed which was not a free, honest and voluntary complainant and accused. Earlier, each other was known and there was no reason with the complainant that he had falsely implicated the accused in the case and that he should be tried for the unknown culprit in the death sentence. No legal or factual error was suggested in examining the evidence from the evidence review. The apex court had refused to take any exception to the finding of the two courts where the accused was charged, which was based on the principles of the criminal administration of justice. divorce advocates from Bewal lawyer