Find a Lawyer

HASSAN SHAH versus STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence, reduction of the prosecution case was stopped on ocular testimony, and the extra-judicial confession of the accused included the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, who were brothers, the complainant described the same incident as the FI. Was given in R and other witnesses have also confirmed the complainant's statement by the prosecution's witnesses. Evidence has shown that the accused had killed the deceased in a critical condition which was due to his injuries. All the witnesses were cross-examined by the accused, but nothing came on the record to discredit their evidence. He belonged to the InterC, but the accused belonged to the complaining party as he was the brother of the complainant's wife, alleged by the accused in his statement under Section 342, CRPC, He did not complain, but so did the complainant and his brothers. Will try to involve himself and his family in a murderous murder case, Apple's conviction of the crime, ocular testimony, confidence in the circumstances was impressive and there was no reason to deny the same prosecution, which led to additional court admissions. The accused who disclosed the testimony also proved to be an extra-judicial admission that he was his wife's wife. Brother Syed's testimony was cross-examined by the accused, but he did not challenge the piece of evidence that found no hostility between the extra-judicial confession and the witness of the accused, nor between them. An animosity was suggested The material available in the record completely proved that the accused was the victim of the murder lawer from fb area from Sialkot lawyer