Find a Lawyer

AFZAL MAQSOOD BUTT versus BANKING COURT NO.2, LAHORE

Section 18 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, Rr 84 and 85 Sale Price, Deposits of Conditioning Defaults Deposited in Sale Price Holding two auctions was successful bid for appellant suit property but in favor of the sale. Was not approved. Therefore, it did not deposit the money in terms of O XXI, R 84. After the CPC, the appellant was directed to submit the entire amount by a certain date, the appellant issued a check which was auctioned. Yes, a fresh schedule of the auction was published and the auction was done, but meanwhile, with the permission of the banking court, the appellant deposited the dishonest check amount in cash. The highest bidder has suspended the sale confirmation in favor of the appellant and the High Court. The exercise of constitutional jurisdiction justified this sale if the buyer failed to fully compute the sale price in terms of O XXI, RR 84 and, 85 CPC, e became invalid and the responsibility of the banking court was That they failed to collect the sale price of the appellant immediately after the sale of the property, losing the right to purchase, in which case the banking court could not exercise its discretion with justification, in the case of default. And waives the submission of the Appellant. Sale Price O XXI, R 85, CPC was required to pay the sale price and in normal circumstances the Banking Court should not be bound by the extension of time to collect the sale price from the time provided under the law. Auction Buyer Failure Banking Court Set Full Price For Sale online advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer