Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, QUETTA versus MESSRS HAJI AHMEDULLAH & COMPANY, QUETTA

Notice of Sections 32 and 181 of Section R No. 374 (I) / 2002, Dated 15 6 2002 The Declaration of Customs Duty The right to pay for the principles of fraud and forgery Customs authorities are authorized to commit fraud and forgery. Submitted to the importer by the goods issuing authorities confiscated the goods and imposed a 300% penalty on the importer's customs, the Customs and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the importer's appeal and the order of the authorities was rejected, The appeal against the appellate tribunal order was dismissed by the High Court under validity; it was not necessary that the forgery and forgery S allegation were responsible for exporting such equipment in prison for fraud and forgery because it is not in accordance with the provisions of the Customs Act 1969, Section 32 and 181. Instead of making a false statement or making a false statement, on the contrary, it was a case of tampering, fraud, forgery, duplication / counterfeiting and, hence, the importer's view of his fraudulent behavior. Was not entitled to any relief as the fraud was committed by the importer for discharging customs duty, question (in) 2002, dated 15 6, regarding any option under notification section RO No. 374. 2002, not born Supreme Court sets aside customs, excise and sales tax appellate tribunal and High Court rulings And the order approved by the authorities was restored. top civil advocates from Kunri lawyer