Find a Lawyer

MEHFOOZ YAR KHAN versus MRS. MARGRATE KARIMULLAH

Section 17 was intended to be used to cover the premises for personal use of the landlord and for various uses by the tenant because the use of the land was sufficiently satisfactory, in the satisfactory record of the house There was no unusual intention of the landlord to gain possession or he wanted the occupation of the present case to be anything other than a personal requirement of landlord. By this evidence he was able to prove that he needed the premises in good faith for his profession, and that he had sufficient reason to sell the property connected with this property, one year and so on. First, three months before the case is filed. The tenant had also used the residential premises or part of the office as his office, in which case the trial court's address was established. High Court denies interference in favor of feudal justice and fairness divorce advocates from Burewala lawyer