Find a Lawyer

SYED AMJAD ALI SAQIB versus NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Rr 3, 4 (1) (a) (ii), 5 & 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appeal after stopping a surcharge for one year and conducting investigation against it. The driver was fined. On the allegation that he committed a misdemeanor and a misdemeanor error and the commission, the further allegation was that the appellant violated the provisions of R157 (1) (2) of the Federal Treasury Rules. Is violated. Applicant's voluntary opening of cross-checks was unlawful in opening a cross-check and other financial procedure act, not as an innocent act or mere wrong-doing, but intentionally and in breach of the established procedure of the Institute. Was a conscious action and it was not a question of violation of the law but also of the appellant's mismanagement which constitutes the discriminatory conduct of good service and discipline and the irresponsibility of an officer and a sensible gentleman. There was no misconduct in opening the proceedings, though. On behalf of the appellant, however, it cannot be said that the appellant's action was understandable as nothing would have been considered in good faith that was not done with proper care, attention and caution. Did not appear to have been dealt with by the appellant. Output penalties could not be interfered with by the appellant, imposing an output penalty on the appellant under proper caution, caution and attention in relation to the opening of the checks, which were dismissed, in the circumstances. jobs for fresh advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer